Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Albus's avatar

Another fine summary!

Robin seemed to be reading the room very quickly with Betty Fuller and deciding that Strike was the less threatening interviewer in this instance. While the dialogue was often crudely funny, Bettyโ€™s sad circumstances were both a counterpoint to the โ€œsex work is workโ€ argument and an opportunity for Robin to reflect on where โ€œsingle peopleโ€ without children end up. Is she starting to question some of her choices?

Robin mentions that something might โ€œbackfire badly against the agencyโ€ twice in TBโ€”her pursuit of an interview with Creed and, earlier, while telling Saul Morris to lay off Gemma. Interestingly, her sensitivity to risking the agency seems to dissipate when she hooks up with Pez Pierce in the next novel and spends an evening publicly snogging a prime murder suspect. In TB, her motives for taking risks are considerate, selfless and nobleโ€”the Robin we all recognize. In IBH, we see an abrupt character shift, exploiting the Pierce interview for personal desires, not so different from the much-despised Morris.

Irvin K's avatar

I really loved the way you compare the Bayliss family and Betty - I'm sure the juxtaposition of those two was intentional on Jo's part.

And we know Job is against the whole "sex work is work" thing, as evidenced by her speaking out against Emma Thompson's views about it, which makes this even more interesting to read in retrospect.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?